|
Copyright Notice: this work is Copyright © 1997 by inX. All rights worldwide under copyright law are reserved to the author. Should you wish to contact the author, you may do so at the following address: tmwg@inxservices.com. Please inform the author of any violations of this copyright. |
In all the years that I've been working with the Science of Man, I've never enjoyed begin asked the seemingly simple question, ``What is it?'' It is taking years to answer that question, emphasis on taking -- a work in process. How many scientists would appreciate being asked to summarize their life's work in a few minutes? Yet the questioner assumes that there is one answer, and that ``the answer'' can be given in a few moments, and that they will be able to understand such an answer.
So the response is usually something specific to the questioner when there is a real interest, or brushed off when, after investigation, there does not seem to be anything more than momentary curiosity.
The honest truth is that there is no answer, or there is my personal answer. The Science of Man is just that: the sum of knowledge based on verified and exact observations of human life based on objective principles describing that living in relationship to physical and spiritual existence. Each who becomes such an investigator has their own interests, and focuses on different aspects of the science that intrigues them. To give a general answer will necessarily miss someone's personal interests, and then they will most likely pass it by as something that isn't of any value to them personally. If the answer that is given here isn't what you're looking for, then ask. Somewhere in the body of knowledge that we call the Science of Man is the principles that describe what you are interested in, personally.
I guess one way to answer the question generally would be to summarize certain aspects of arriving on planet Earth as a human being, and what develops from that perverse method of arrival that we call being born. Please understand that this is very general, and that there are always specific differences. The general outline has been the case with everyone whom I have ever met, though: even when there are specific differences here and there, they are small things and do not disturb the whole of the general description. Each can fill in those differences for them self.
Excuse me for a moment while the author intrudes into the material being written. Personally, I'm not very good at linear thinking, which is amusing since I make a living as a computer programmer: please don't tell my clients! I humbly request that you bear with the seeming rambling form of this presentation, and see what is being presented, even if you don't like its